Three Perspectives on Information Literacy in Academia: Talking to Librarians, Faculty, and Students

Anna Yevelson-Shorsher, Jenny Bronstein


This study presents three perspectives on the subject of information literacy skills in academia by examining the perceptions of students, teaching faculty, and librarians. Information literacy (sometime referred to as critical thinking or research skills) has become a crucial set of skills in academic work since developments in informational and technological environments have given students access to vast amounts of information that is often unsupported, unfiltered, and unreliable. Data collected from 32 semi-structured interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings show that students felt that they lacked adequate information literacy skills, did not receive sufficient help from the faculty, and were unaware of the resources and services the library offered. Professors, however, considered such skills important and expected students to obtain them during their studies. The library staff were aware of students’ difficulties in acquiring these skills and have made efforts to develop programs to remedy the situation. However, these programs were not always successful due to a lack of awareness by students, and the incompatibility of such programs with their needs and the expectations of their instructors. By contrasting the views, needs and expectations of the three populations studied, findings from the study show that greater collaboration and communication between faculty, librarians, and students is needed to improve students’ information literacy skills. The study also provides the LIS field with an outline of an 'ideal' information literacy training for students as it is reflected in the combined views of the participated populations.

Full Text:

Copyright Anna Yevelson-Shorsher, Jenny Bronstein

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Article Views (Last 12 Months)

No data available

Contact ACRL for article usage statistics from 2010-April 2017.

Article Views (By Year/Month)

January: 453
February: 409
March: 578
April: 329
May: 495
June: 417
July: 431
August: 328
September: 432
October: 0
January: 367
February: 355
March: 480
April: 311
May: 255
June: 237
July: 223
August: 291
September: 476
October: 474
November: 451
December: 337
January: 395
February: 454
March: 545
April: 628
May: 471
June: 505
July: 379
August: 350
September: 536
October: 651
November: 586
December: 272
January: 237
February: 329
March: 283
April: 376
May: 352
June: 247
July: 209
August: 214
September: 242
October: 390
November: 241
December: 380
January: 217
February: 297
March: 429
April: 391
May: 371
June: 286
July: 400
August: 270
September: 360
October: 364
November: 302
December: 253
January: 18
February: 20
March: 25
April: 29
May: 945
June: 210
July: 145
August: 144
September: 236
October: 239
November: 307
December: 139
April: 0
May: 0
June: 0
July: 0
August: 281
September: 77
October: 21
November: 33
December: 9