Science A&I Database Holdings at ARL and Oberlin Group Libraries, 2011–2016: A Longitudinal Study

Timothy W. Klassen


After instituting major cuts to discipline-specific science abstracting and indexing (A&I) databases at an ARL library due to significant budget cuts, the author sought to determine if such cuts were being made by other academic libraries and what trends could be found in holdings of such databases. Annually, over the course of eight years, 108 ARL libraries and 74 Oberlin Group library website A–Z database lists were reviewed to look for the presence of 21 Science and Technology A&I databases. Additions and cancellations were recorded and verified. The results indicate little change in the holdings of several discipline-specific databases including MathsciNet, SciFinder Scholar, and GeoRef, while there were declines in holdings of several other databases including INSPEC, Biological Abstracts, and Compendex. Also measured were holdings of Proquest and EBSCO science A&I databases, which saw small declines in holdings, as well as holdings of comprehensive A&I databases Scopus and Web of Science, which saw a significant increase for Scopus holdings.

Full Text:

Copyright Timothy W. Klassen

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Article Views (Last 12 Months)

No data available

Contact ACRL for article usage statistics from 2010-April 2017.

Article Views (By Year/Month)

January: 11
February: 10
March: 11
April: 3
May: 1
January: 20
February: 34
March: 18
April: 19
May: 13
June: 18
July: 18
August: 15
September: 6
October: 10
November: 12
December: 6
January: 0
February: 3
March: 287
April: 72
May: 82
June: 13
July: 38
August: 150
September: 23
October: 24
November: 9
December: 7