The Boolean is Dead, Long Live the Boolean! Natural Language versus Boolean Searching in Introductory Undergraduate Instruction

M. Sara Lowe, Bronwen K. Maxson, Sean M. Stone, Willie Miller, Eric Snajdr, Kathleen Hanna

Abstract

Boolean logic can be a difficult concept for first‐year, introductory students to grasp. This paper compares the results of Boolean and natural language searching across several databases with searches created from student research questions. Performance differences between databases varied. Overall, natural search language is at least as good as Boolean searching. With evidence that students struggle to grasp Boolean searching, and may not use it even after instruction, it could be left out of first‐year instruction, freeing up valuable class time to focus on concepts such as question development and source evaluation. As the Framework for Information Literary does not specifically address Boolean operators, the authors suggest it should have less prominence in first‐year Information Literacy instruction.

Full Text:

PDF HTML
Copyright M. Sara Lowe, Bronwen K. Maxson, Sean M. Stone, Willie Miller, Eric Snajdr, Kathleen Hanna


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Article Views (Last 12 Months)

No data available

Contact ACRL for article usage statistics from 2010-April 2017.

Article Views (By Year/Month)

2018
January: 288
February: 60
March: 54
April: 26
May: 1772
June: 533
July: 304
August: 199
September: 232
October: 139
November: 152
December: 68
2017
April: 0
May: 0
June: 0
July: 0
August: 23
September: 96
October: 19
November: 19
December: 10